Blind Resume | Shooting Guard-3/12/10

Posted on Friday, March 12th, 2010 and is filed under Blind Resume. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

By Paul Gotham

Okay, connoisseurs of all that is basketball, let us take the time and pour over some numbers. Below you will find raw statistics. The identities of these players are removed to avoid any possible allegiances or biases. Please avoid guessing or suggesting the players indicated by the statistics. Let’s discuss the possible value these players bring to their teams and to any team.

Today, we have a pair of shooting guards that square off a little later. What do you think?

Player A

PPG 13.1 (team scores 73.4 while allowing 63.7), FG percentage 45.6 (145/ 318 teams shoots 45.6 814/ 1,785), 3Pt. percentage 48.3 (72/ 149 team shoots 41.0 256/ 625), FT percentage 66.3 (57/ 86 team shoots 74.3 466/ 627), Assist to Turnover ratio 1.1 : 1 (team 1.5 : 1), RPG 2.7 (team rebound margin -.6), Fouls 2.3, Minutes played 29.4, his team’s strength of schedule (CBS) is ranked 41.

Player B

PPG 17.0 (team scores 73.5 while allowing 65.5) FG percentage 53.0 (186/ 351 team shoots 49.9 824/ 1,651), 3Pt. percentage 45.5 (56/ 123 team shoots 39.0 194/ 498), FT percentage 85.3 (81/ 95 team shoots 70.9 437/ 616), Assist to Turnover ratio 1.3 : 1 (team 1.1 : 1), RPG 3.5 (team rebound margin +2.2), Fouls 1.8, Minutes played 34.3, his team’s strength of schedule (CBS) is ranked 1.

Remember, the object is NOT to guess or suggest the player identities. The identities will be disclosed later. Let’s talk some hoops.

4 Responses to “Blind Resume | Shooting Guard-3/12/10”

  1. crossword peteMarch 12th, 2010 - 1:19 pm

    Player B. With a better team SOS and more points per game, he’s my clear-cut choice. I want offense and he contributes more assists, rebounds, and takes more shots. He understands his role and contributes in a significant way. He has a much higher FT%age and a shooting guard should be getting himself to the line frequently. Based on his FPG I would question his defense, but again, that is not his role, and Player A doesn’t fare much better in that category anyway. Player A not only pales in comparison statistically, but does so against weaker competition.

  2. WallyMarch 12th, 2010 - 5:25 pm

    What’s the catch, Casey? B is far superior to A … why is there even a question?? I note that you didn’t say anything about steals, but doubt that would close the gap much.

  3. Mike MowryMarch 13th, 2010 - 10:13 am

    I’m wondering the same thing, lol. I would easily take #2 and it’s not even close.

  4. CaseyMarch 13th, 2010 - 10:43 am

    No catch. What I was trying to do, did not work. I wanted to see if anyone would give player A credit for the advantage behind the arc. If Marquette beat GU yesterday, it could made for a conversation today. Again, it didn’t work.

    Player A: Darius Johnson-Odom Marquette

    Player B: Austin Freeman Georgetown

    Johnson-Odom has had some big games of late. He went 5 of 7 from behind the arc in Thursday’s game against Villanova.

Leave a Reply


on the Pine

  • Loading...

An ESPN SportsNation Favorite

Use your free Microsoft Tag App to scan below and stay connected with Pickin' Splinters on the go!
Follow PickinSplinters on Twitter
International Response Fund
Listen to internet radio with PickinSplinters on Blog Talk Radio

Follow Pickin’ Splinters on:

Subscribe via RSS
Log in / WordPress NewsPaper Theme by GabfireThemes 2008 © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED